Author: blass uri
Date: 01:30:05 05/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2000 at 03:22:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 02, 2000 at 03:02:19, Chessfun wrote: > >>Really.....since Jouni's were on a single machine ponder=off and >>that 11-9 we are talking about was two machines ponder=on, how >>do you conclude that?. > >I've only stated that the possibility of such a result is non-zero. Since the >effect of ponder and the number of machines is unclear, the likelihood of >similar results with that configuration is also non-zero. > >>If it is on the basis of my statement above relevant to ponder=on >>"I expect it to win with ponder=off or ponder=on." then the 12-8 >>isn't valid as that was Jouni's score and in fact the games were >>bogus as playing them a third time proved. > >I assume that this is a conclusion/belief/statement/opinion. Unfortunately, it's >a wrong one. How do you know that the conclusion is wrong? Did you ask for the games to check them with crafty and Fritz? If you prove that the moves in the 11-9 match can be reproduced with the same times and that the moves in the 15-5 matches cannot be reproduced then it is a proof that the problem was in the 15-5 matches but I understand that you did not ask for the games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.