Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this move really the best?

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 08:37:58 05/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 02, 2000 at 09:07:42, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:

>
>In my set of tactical test positions there is the following example:
>
>[D] 2rqk2r/pb1nbp1p/4p1p1/1B1n4/Np1N4/7Q/PP3PPP/R1B1R1K1 w k – bm Rxe6
>
>I can’t remember where I have found this position, but the solution is supposed
>to be Rxe6. Until know every version of Shredder has found this move sooner or
>later and kept it as a best move until the end of my test time.
>
>Last night I have tested my latest version and found something interesting.
>Shredder played Rxe6 after a while as usual, but got a terrible fail low for
>that move at ply 11.
>
>So here is my question:
>Is Rxe6 really the best move and I have introduced a bug somewhere in my code or
>is Rxe6 a mistake? I didn’t find an improvement for white after 1. Rxe6 fxe6,
>but this can be due to my limited chess knowledge.
>
>Here is Shredder’s output:
>
> 6.01   0:00.71  -0.23   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bd3 Bf6 3.Nf3 a5 (63.557) 88.3
> 6 ->   0:01.76  -0.23   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bd3 Bf6 3.Nf3 a5 (159.299) 90.2
> 7.01   0:02.71  -0.09   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bd3 Bf6 3.Nb3 N5b6 4.Nxb6 Qxb6
>                         (240.167) 88.3
> 7 ->   0:04.90  -0.09   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bd3 Bf6 3.Nb3 N5b6 4.Nxb6 Qxb6
>                         (435.029) 88.6
> 8.01   0:07.96  -0.01   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bf1 N7f6 3.Rad1 Qa5 4.Bg7 Nf4
>                         (704.124) 88.3
> 8 ->   0:10.15  -0.01   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bf1 N7f6 3.Rad1 Qa5 4.Bg7 Nf4 (911.624) 89.7
> 9.01   0:17.93  -0.17   1.Bh6 a6 2.Be2 Bg5 3.Bf3 Nf4 4.Qg3 Bxh6 5.Bxb7
>                         (1.594.580) 88.8
> 9 ->   0:32.29  -0.17   1.Bh6 a6 2.Be2 Bg5 3.Bf3 Nf4 4.Qg3 Bxh6 5.Bxb7
>                         (2.918.536) 90.3
>10.01   0:42.76  -0.14   1.Bh6 a6 2.Be2 Qa5 3.b3 e5 4.Nf3 e4 5.Nd2 f5
>                         (3.876.621) 90.6
>10.08   2:02.76  -0.13++ 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7 4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+
>                         Kf8 6.Nxb7 (11.210.309) 91.3
>10.08   2:26.60  +0.22++ 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7 4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+
>                         Kf8 6.Bh6+ Kf7 7.Nxb7 a6 8.Nxa5 Rc1+ 9.Rxc1
>                         (13.366.273) 91.1
>10.08   3:25.78  +0.40   1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re2 O-O 3.Bh6 Re8 4.Rae1 a6 5.Bd3 a5 6.b3
>                         (18.827.259) 91.4
>10 ->   3:45.35  +0.40   1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re2 O-O 3.Bh6 Re8 4.Rae1 a6 5.Bd3 a5 6.b3
>                         (20.541.368) 91.1
>11.01   5:35.76  +0.15-- 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7 4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+
>                         Kf7 6.Nxb7 Rc7 7.Nd6+ Kg7 8.Ne8+ Rxe8 9.b3 Rxc1+
>                         (31.352.209) 93.3
>11.01   9:18.76  -0.35-- 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7 4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+
>                         Kf7 6.Nxb7 Rc7 7.Nd6+ Kg7 8.Ne8+ Rxe8 9.Qxe8 Nf6
>                         10.Qb8 Bd6 (54.470.299) 97.4
>11.01  14:41.53  -1.36   1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7 4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+
>                         Kf7 6.Nxb7 Rc7 7.Nxa5 Rxd7 8.Nc6 Rc7 9.Nxe7
>                         (86.129.099) 97.7
>11.02  14:52.57  -1.35++ 1.Bh6 a6 2.Be2 Qa5 3.b3 Nf4 4.Bxf4 Bxg2 5.Qxg2
>                         (87.133.005) 97.6
>11.02  15:07.65  -1.00++ 1.Bh6 a6 2.Bxd7+ Qxd7 3.Nxe6 Qxa4 4.Ng7+ Kd8 5.Qd7+
>                         Qxd7 (88.458.785) 97.4
>11.02  16:23.21  -0.10   1.Bh6 a6 2.Bxd7+ Qxd7 3.b3 e5 4.Qxd7+ Kxd7 5.Rxe5 Bf6
>                         6.Rxd5+ Bxd5 7.Nb6+ Kd6 8.Nxc8+ Kd7 9.Re1
>                         (95.283.049) 96.9
>
>(I have formatted it a bit, hopefully it helps...)
>
>Stefan

Hi Stefan,

This position was part of Rebel10's anti-GM discussion a few years ago. Rxe6
maybe is not the best move but it surely can confuse a GM so much he loses
oversight and start to blunder in all the tactical complications. Like Shredder
also Rebel fails low at a certain moment, see below.

Ed

PS, on a 128 Mb machine what are the best hash table settings? I use 48 Mb
for the hash table and 16 Mb for the position table but so now and then I
still notice swapping so I wonder.


_______________________________________________________________________________

00:00:03  7.20  -0.77  1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7
                       4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+ Kf7 6.Qe6+ Kg7
                       7.Nxb7 Qxa4 8.Qxd5  (3)

00:00:09  8.00  -0.01  1.Rxe6 a6 2.Rxe7+ Nxe7 3.Bxd7+ Qxd7
                       4.Qxd7 Kxd7 5.Nb6 Kc7 6.Nxc8 Rxc8
                       7.Bd2 Nd5 8.Rc1 Kd6 9.Rxc8 Bxc8  (6)

00:00:22  9.00  0.20   1.Rxe6 a6 2.Bxa6 fxe6 3.Bxb7 Rc4
                       4.Nxe6 Qa5 5.Qf3  (10)

00:01:03 10.00  0.19   1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re2 a6 3.Bd3 Rxc1+
                       4.Rxc1 Nf4 5.Qe3 Nxe2+ 6.Qxe2 Qa5
                       7.b3  (24)

00:02:00 11.00  -0.32  1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7
                       4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+ Kf7 6.Nxb7 Rc7
                       7.Nd6+ Kg7 8.Ne8+ Rxe8 9.Qxe8 Nf6
                       10.Qb8 Rxc1+ 11.Rxc1 Qxa4  (93)

00:04:06 12.00  -0.91  1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Nxe6 Qa5 3.Bxd7+ Kxd7
                       4.Nec5+ Ke8 5.Qd7+ Kf7 6.Nxb7 Rc7
                       7.Nxa5 Rxd7 8.Nc6 Kg7 9.Bd2  (210)

00:10:00 12.03  -0.85  1.Bd2 a6 2.Bd3 O-O 3.Bh6 Re8 4.Rac1
                       Rxc1 5.Rxc1 Bg5 6.Nc6  (297)




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.