Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 06:21:49 05/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2000 at 06:56:36, Paulo Soares wrote: >On May 02, 2000 at 13:31:17, Dan Ellwein wrote: > >>On May 02, 2000 at 13:10:18, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >> >>>http://www.forbes.com/asap/99/0222/071.htm JAFM >> >>thanks for the article JAFM... >> >>Game 2 of the Kasparov-Deep Blue rematch should be called... >> >>"The Game of the Century" >> >>it was definitely a 'watershed' in the history of man-machine encounters... >> >>regards - pilgrimdan > >I am not sure, but seemed that in game 2 of the rematch Kasparov lost when he >had the draw assured by perpetual check. If this is true, I don't agree that >this is the " game of the century ", because Kasparov don't make these >type of mistakes. > >Paulo Soares, from Brazil Kasparov did have the draw 'assured' but he did not see the draw till it was pointed out to him the next day... i agree that Kasparov doesn't normally make these type of mistakes... if i'm not mistaken, that was the first time that a reigning world champion resigned in a drawn position... this game has significance if for no other reason than that...
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.