Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:30:56 05/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2000 at 00:50:24, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On May 02, 2000 at 19:57:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 02, 2000 at 18:53:03, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>Bob, the article is over a year old. >>> >>>Dave >> >> >>I didn't see a date. > >The date is not only in the URL, it is also right under the "FORBES ASAP" >headline. I found it hard to miss, but apparently YMMV applies. JAFM has >posted quite a few links to web sites, most of which have been around for quite >a while already. When I go to view one of them, one of the first things I look >for is when it was written. > >>But he has made that statement _many_ times. Has he ever recanted it? >> >>Didn't think so... > >What's to recant? The statement is accurate in context. He didn't say they >would never provide them, just that they hadn't. Besides, IBM doesn't seem to >have gone to any great lengths to publicize that they have since been released. > >Dave I simply make (the sometimes wrong) assumption that something posted here is 'current' and not a year+ old. I see little point in providing links to some- thing that has been out for over a year, when posting it on an electronic medium. I'll try to play detective next time and look for dates. But in any case, I notice he still says the same things in other places.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.