Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:38:02 05/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2000 at 02:26:31, blass uri wrote: >On May 02, 2000 at 02:00:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On May 01, 2000 at 23:23:18, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2000 at 19:20:46, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>What selectivity of results? please specify what you are talking about. >>>I clearly stated I had a problem with the autoplayer after Uri's post. >>>I posted at day one anyone wanting the games email me. >>>I got one request. >> >>I was referring to 5/0 results, where you went through the cycle twice. You >>assumed that the 11-9 was wrong, when there's nothing to suggest that at all. > >She did not assume that the 11-9 was wrong but that one of the result was wrong. >It is also logical always to suspect more that the second result is wrong if you >have 2 results. > >After a third nunn match she found that the result was again 15-5 and it is an >evidence that the 11-9 was wrong. > >Uri Uri, You are totally correct. The 5/0, 11-9 games I deleted from the computer storing the match results, which would have had Crafty's evals, but they were also saved by the computer running F6. They exhibit the same problems you had observed with the 25 min games. F6 posting depths of 8 ply when in analysis it gets to 11 in a matter of seconds. The autoplayer at times just seems to cause these problems. Clearly even were the depths to read ok without analysis of every move there is no way to know for sure that both are operating correctly. Thanks for your input. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.