Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 11:42:54 05/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2000 at 13:35:33, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >On May 03, 2000 at 09:21:49, Dan Ellwein wrote: > >>On May 03, 2000 at 06:56:36, Paulo Soares wrote: >> >>>On May 02, 2000 at 13:31:17, Dan Ellwein wrote: >>> >>>>On May 02, 2000 at 13:10:18, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.forbes.com/asap/99/0222/071.htm JAFM >>>> >>>>thanks for the article JAFM... >>>> >>>>Game 2 of the Kasparov-Deep Blue rematch should be called... >>>> >>>>"The Game of the Century" >>>> >>>>it was definitely a 'watershed' in the history of man-machine encounters... >>>> >>>>regards - pilgrimdan >>> >>>I am not sure, but seemed that in game 2 of the rematch Kasparov lost when he >>>had the draw assured by perpetual check. If this is true, I don't agree that >>>this is the " game of the century ", because Kasparov don't make these >>>type of mistakes. >>> >>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil >> >>Kasparov did have the draw 'assured' but he did not see the draw till it was >>pointed out to him the next day... >> >>i agree that Kasparov doesn't normally make these type of mistakes... >> >>if i'm not mistaken, that was the first time that a reigning world champion >>resigned in a drawn position... >> >>this game has significance if for no other reason than that... > >Here are three links on that remarkable game 2: >http://computer.org/internet/xtras/mcgrew9703.htm >http://www.chesscorner.com/games/deepblue/dblue2.htm >http://www.insidechess.com/events/kasparov2.html thanks JAFM for the articles concerning game 2... especially the first and last one... Dan
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.