Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:57:29 05/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2000 at 04:13:55, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 03, 2000 at 21:52:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Do you _really_ think that had Kasparov won, that he would have sat down with >>the DB team and laid out what he was thinking, etc? Do you think that after >>any big-ticket match like that, that the winner sits down with the loser and >>gives him details about what he was thinking, planning, how he thought his >>positions were at various points in the game, etc? > >GM's do it all the time AFAIK, except when it's a world championship match. Do >you really think that the operator of Deep Blue would be able to comprehend >Kasparovs thinking. I don't think so. I talk with my WinBoard engines all the >time about their playing style and choice of moves, unfortunately they are very >silent :o). > >Best wishes... >Mogens Yes. At least one of the operators (Murray) is a 2200+ chess player. However even I talk to a couple of GM players _regularly_ and I don't have trouble following their analysis. I may get bogged down in tactics that they see instantly but which takes me a bit to unwind, but I can talk, listen, and for the most part, understand... I don't always _agree_ with them, which is the _real_ problem. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.