Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:12:35 05/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2000 at 05:27:03, blass uri wrote: >On May 07, 2000 at 03:31:24, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On May 06, 2000 at 15:51:55, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >> >>>On the ChessBits homepage >>> >>>http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html >>> >>>you can find a live game between Fritz experimental and Shredder experimental >> >>Fritz is no experimental version and the hardware and time control favour >>Fritz6a very much. > >1)How do you know that Fritz is not experimental version? Because the operator told so. :-) >I looked at the times and Fritz seems to play without an opening book(otherwise >Fritz would not use time for theory moves). The operator, CBBTEG = ChessBaseBetaTesterErdoganGünes, used his own book. >2)The hardware favours Fritz but if it is Fritz6a and not experimental Fritz >then I guess that one detail favours shredder(the hash tables) > >Fritz is using too big hash tables for this time control so I guess that the not >experimental version needs time to clear the hash tables between moves so the >fact that Fritz is using 600 Mbytes is a disadvantage at 30 minutes/game. I disagree. AFAIK Fritz uses persistant hash tables without any clearing. >3)How do you know that fast time control favour Fritz against shredder >experimental version? Short time controls with hardware advantage, come on Uri, even you must see this. ;-) Except for Hiarcs, only fast searchers are good rapid chess players. >The only way to know is by testing both versions. >Do you have shredder experimental version? I am no beta-tester. >I think that it is wrong to assume without testing that the time control favours >shredder only because of the fact that shredder is slower in nps. > >Uri See various tournament results, it is fact that Shredder profits much from longer time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.