Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My Challenge to every russian GM needing some extra bucks...

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 07:15:56 05/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 10, 2000 at 09:24:28, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:

>
>>>Even worse with those Dutch guys. To draw the comparison further with your
>>>proposal, you hire a Russian GM for 50 bucks and agree to play a game with him
>>>on Barbados, under the swaying palm trees.
>>>
>>>After he has agreed and signed the contact,
>
>No, after he played a few tourniaments which you held to select whom of the many
>russian GMs to invite,
>
>you tell him you decided it will be
>>>a 12 game tournament and it will be in the middle of the Negev desert, at noon,
>>>but he will get $70, in stead of $50. He tells you that's not the agreement, as
>>>it is standing clearly in the contract. He should play one game for $50, on
>>>Barbados, that was agreed.
>>>
>>>But you take your pen, scratch away some lines, and change it, saying "here you
>>>are, this is the contact, sir. Play on, don't be a sissy."
>>
>>At this point he has a choice. Accepting the new contract or not. If not he can
>>still claim the old contract, but he won't get the 70 $
>>
>>>
>>>Now he can choose: will he take 50 bucks or not?
>>
>>ie Does he accept the new contract ?
>>
>>>Our empoverished Russian thinks: "If I am swindled, I can be swindling too".
>>
>>He thinks he is swindled, he's telling everybody he is, and  after a while he
>>believes it himself. Bottom line is, he accepted the new contract.
>>
>>>After playing twelve games in a row each resigning after the first move he
>>>cashes in and leaves (for a beer, probably -as it's damn hot in the Negev).
>>>
>>>And you, Fernando, stay behind, and tell all your friends here: "I've been
>>>swindled!".
>>
>>As he has been. The guy accepted the new terms and did not do what he was
>>expected to do. Actually a reason to not pay him at all.
>
>A contract is not about what you "expect" someone to do but about what is in the
>contract. If the contract says you need to play a game, then 1.e4 0-1 is fine.

No it's not. It is the letter of the contract wich is different from fine, and
if somebody behaves that way and claims he can do so because it's legal, you
have a right to say your swindled.

Tony

>
>
>Georg



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.