Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:40:22 05/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2000 at 03:38:40, blass uri wrote: >On May 11, 2000 at 03:07:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >>On May 11, 2000 at 02:27:39, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On May 10, 2000 at 23:17:24, stuart taylor wrote: >>><snipped> >>>>I don't know which hiarcs did not get it in 10 mins. My Hiarcs 7.0 on a k6-3 >>>> 400mhz. gets it in 14 mins. So hiarcs 7.32 I would have thought would take half >>>>that time. >>> >>>I do not think that hiarcs7.32 is 2 times faster relative to hiarcs7 >> >>2x faster won't even earn a whole ply unless your branching factor is (a >>remarkable) 2 or less. >> >>So 2x in speed won't earn a massive improvement by itself. I have no idea how >>much faster 7.32 is than 7.01 (which is what I have). > >2 times faster is probably close to 70 points improvement in the ssdf rating >list. > >I know that the ssdf results give with the same programs about 70 elo >improvement between p200 and K6-450 when the speed difference is dependent on >the program but is about being 2 times faster. From this figure (and an exponential extrapolation) we should be able to figure out the approximate speedup. What is the point difference between 7.01 and 7.32 on the same hardware?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.