Author: blass uri
Date: 00:45:53 05/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2000 at 03:40:22, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 11, 2000 at 03:38:40, blass uri wrote: >>On May 11, 2000 at 03:07:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>On May 11, 2000 at 02:27:39, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On May 10, 2000 at 23:17:24, stuart taylor wrote: >>>><snipped> >>>>>I don't know which hiarcs did not get it in 10 mins. My Hiarcs 7.0 on a k6-3 >>>>> 400mhz. gets it in 14 mins. So hiarcs 7.32 I would have thought would take half >>>>>that time. >>>> >>>>I do not think that hiarcs7.32 is 2 times faster relative to hiarcs7 >>> >>>2x faster won't even earn a whole ply unless your branching factor is (a >>>remarkable) 2 or less. >>> >>>So 2x in speed won't earn a massive improvement by itself. I have no idea how >>>much faster 7.32 is than 7.01 (which is what I have). >> >>2 times faster is probably close to 70 points improvement in the ssdf rating >>list. >> >>I know that the ssdf results give with the same programs about 70 elo >>improvement between p200 and K6-450 when the speed difference is dependent on >>the program but is about being 2 times faster. > >From this figure (and an exponential extrapolation) we should be able to figure >out the approximate speedup. What is the point difference between 7.01 and 7.32 >on the same hardware? I do not remmeber the exact numbers now but it was not close to 70 It was about 10 elo rating difference. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.