Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 01:50:08 05/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2000 at 03:45:53, blass uri wrote: >On May 11, 2000 at 03:40:22, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On May 11, 2000 at 03:38:40, blass uri wrote: >>>On May 11, 2000 at 03:07:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>On May 11, 2000 at 02:27:39, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 10, 2000 at 23:17:24, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>><snipped> >>>>>>I don't know which hiarcs did not get it in 10 mins. My Hiarcs 7.0 on a k6-3 >>>>>> 400mhz. gets it in 14 mins. So hiarcs 7.32 I would have thought would take half >>>>>>that time. >>>>> >>>>>I do not think that hiarcs7.32 is 2 times faster relative to hiarcs7 >>>> >>>>2x faster won't even earn a whole ply unless your branching factor is (a >>>>remarkable) 2 or less. >>>> >>>>So 2x in speed won't earn a massive improvement by itself. I have no idea how >>>>much faster 7.32 is than 7.01 (which is what I have). >>> >>>2 times faster is probably close to 70 points improvement in the ssdf rating >>>list. >>> >>>I know that the ssdf results give with the same programs about 70 elo >>>improvement between p200 and K6-450 when the speed difference is dependent on >>>the program but is about being 2 times faster. >> >>From this figure (and an exponential extrapolation) we should be able to figure >>out the approximate speedup. What is the point difference between 7.01 and 7.32 >>on the same hardware? > >I do not remmeber the exact numbers now but it was not close to 70 >It was about 10 elo rating difference. > >Uri H732 is rated by the SSDF 17 points higher that H7, both on equal hardware. H732 is 10 to 20% faster than H7. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.