Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 01:43:05 10/23/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 1997 at 17:42:00, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On October 22, 1997 at 13:29:57, Chris Whittington wrote: > >>Who has got numbers for P2 200 -> P2 300 ? > >What are you trying to compare? I didn't mention a PII/200, I have a >Pentium Pro 200 mhz machine (Gateway, good machine). I wanted to know, since I thought I might be a late entrant into the arms race myself. See how it takes off, unwanted by most participants ? ......... Thorsten is checking out on p2 300 prices and availability right now. Sad isn't it ? Chris > >Here is a chart, if you are interested. Each line is a position in the >LCTI test. The first depth number is the depth *finished* on the P6, >the second is the depth *finished* on the 533 mhz Alpha. An exclamation >point indicates that the numbers are different. The "Time (P6)" column >is the amount of time taken to finish this ply. Likewise for the "Time >(533)" column. The "ratio" is the 533 time divided by the P6 time. > >At the end is a ratio you get if you add up all of the times and divide, >that's the number I quoted, earlier: 1/0.5652 is about 176.7% or so. I >figured I should explain how I got my speed figures. > >Conclude whatever you want from this. > >bruce > >------------ > >Name Depth Time (P6) Time (533) > ratio >position 001 13/14! 00:01:45.491 00:00:59.140 >56.06% >position 002 12/12 00:03:01.611 00:01:38.844 >54.43% >position 003 11/11 00:03:27.478 00:01:54.071 >54.98% >position 004 13/13 00:03:25.336 00:01:52.250 >54.67% >position 005 10/11! 00:00:48.560 00:00:25.781 >53.09% >position 006 14/14 00:03:00.450 00:01:41.211 >56.09% >position 007 11/11 00:01:09.510 00:00:37.617 >54.12% >position 008 11/11 00:00:24.885 00:00:13.477 >54.16% >position 009 12/12 00:02:36.666 00:01:23.805 >53.49% >position 010 12/12 00:03:06.318 00:01:42.320 >54.92% >position 011 15/16! 00:02:45.187 00:01:34.984 >57.50% >position 012 12/13! 00:02:20.021 00:01:17.961 >55.68% >position 013 13/13 00:03:12.346 00:01:49.610 >56.99% >position 014 12/13! 00:02:32.109 00:01:23.132 >54.65% >position 015 14/14 00:02:55.873 00:01:35.875 >54.51% >position 016 12/13! 00:01:48.686 00:01:00.125 >55.32% >position 017 12/12 00:02:43.245 00:01:32.430 >56.62% >position 018 11/11 00:02:40.151 00:01:26.906 >54.27% >position 019 12/12 00:02:46.409 00:01:31.703 >55.11% >position 020 21/22! 00:02:36.875 00:01:41.289 >64.57% >position 021 18/19! 00:01:50.128 00:01:08.469 >62.17% >position 022 19/20! 00:02:09.467 00:01:14.813 >57.79% >position 023 15/15 00:03:14.119 00:01:54.516 >58.99% >position 024 16/16 00:03:11.175 00:01:52.141 >58.66% >position 025 16/17! 00:02:49.624 00:01:38.227 >57.91% >position 026 14/15! 00:02:10.828 00:01:12.835 >55.67% >position 027 16/16 00:03:19.116 00:01:54.914 >57.71% >position 028 15/16! 00:02:57.114 00:01:42.945 >58.12% > 4248778 2401391 56.52%
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.