Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:57:03 05/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2000 at 21:16:32, blass uri wrote: >On May 13, 2000 at 21:13:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On May 13, 2000 at 20:36:42, Roger Kyte wrote: >> >>>On May 13, 2000 at 20:32:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On May 13, 2000 at 20:09:38, Roger Kyte wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 13, 2000 at 19:51:18, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I remember 13 years ago when the top program Mchess was reaching Master level >>>>>>close to 2200 Elo by USCF and I also remember a statement from Larry Kaufman >>>>>>saying that it will take at least a good 15 years for a P.C. program to reach >>>>>>GM level at the rate of Processors speed doubling every years, at that time the >>>>>>top Processor was a mere 80286 operating at 12 Mhz at the most. I Thought at >>>>>>that time that Kasparov if he was still Champion will defeat very easy a P.C. >>>>>>in game in 30 minutes per side. But now that the time has arrived I realize that >>>>>>any of the top three P.C. Programs with any processor higher than 800 >>>>>>Mhz can beat Kasparov in game in 30 minutes per side. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Do you have any proof of this 30 min statement ?? >>>>> >>>>>>PS: Since piket just recently beat Kasparov in the Grand Prix not to long ago, >>>>>>and Fritz SSS drew Piket at the Dutch Tournamwent, I can almost presume that in >>>>>>game in 60 minutes per side, Fritz SSS or any other top three Programs can beat >>>>>>Kasparov in a mini match of 7 games using the latest Processor. >>>>> >>>>>Presumptions are just that. Tangible proof is better. Perhaps this Deep Junior >>>>>thing with the 8 xeons will shed some more light on the phenomenon. >>>> >>>>I am not basing this on presumptions if you clearly remember Shredder3 also drew >>>>Karpov in game in 60 minutes per side. >>> >>> >>>You said BEAT not DRAW Kasparov in 30 minutes. So you are making a presumption. >>> You have not stated any proof ! >> >>According to an Interview by Leonxto Garcia at the WijK aan Zee. The World no.1 >>addressed the question of playing Fritz 6 or its succesors at Frankfurt Giants >>in June. this was Kasparov statement " Ive informed the organizers that I won't >>take part if Fritz 6 plays, then he mentioned I well remember the trouble that >>Genius game me at the London Intel tournament in 1994" >> >>PS: Now do you remember that Genius was only playing with a mere 80486 at 466 >>Mhz, Nowaday computer are 5 times faster and Fritz is much better than genius >>wasin 1994. > >Genius was playing with p90 and not with 80486 and I believe that kasparov is >also better than kasparov of 1994 in playing against computers > >Uri thank for the clarification I just checked that information 10 minutes ago, But even if it was a Pentium 90 Mhz capable of only 210 MIPS Versus an AMD Athlon 1000 Mhz capable of 3041 MIPS the difference in MIPS is about 12 times faster Plus Fritz is much beteer program than genius was in 1994. PS: Just comparing the hardware along there is a difference of a least 2800 hundred MIPS or 12 times faster, sorry but I do not think that Kasparov is 12 times better than he was in 1994. In game in 30 minutes per side, he is refusing to play, probably he already have tested himself against fritz several times. There have to be a strong reason for him to refuse to play at Frankfurst Giants if Fritz 6 plays.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.