Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 08:13:12 05/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2000 at 11:07:05, Drazen Marovic wrote: >On May 13, 2000 at 12:29:40, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On May 13, 2000 at 12:21:56, Frederic Friedel wrote: >> >>>52. Bc1 Qh5 53. Qxg3 * (0:50/0:23) >>> >>>Thou art wise, my friend (+4.00 and Fritz advocates 53...Nxd5). >>> >>>Actually a wonderful game, >> >>Yes, a horribly played win by Fritz... >> > >I think that statement is a bit of a slap in the face to Grooten. I'm sorry if it reads this way, because I meant the opposite. Fritz played badly and won, while Grooten neutralized Fritz and built up a fine attack, finally spoiled out of impatience. That's what I wanted to say. > Just because >you don't understand why moves are made doesn't make them bad. Further i guess >you would rather play what you consider a wonderfully played loss. No. A deserved win, as opposed to a punch in the liver after playing silly. Enrique >>Enrique >> >>> which I'm going to enjoy analysing. I'm convinced >>>Grooten had good winning chances against a computer which didn't fully >>>understand the treat on the kingside (Maybe Frans's latest version did).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.