Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:23:44 05/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2000 at 18:08:02, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 14, 2000 at 16:32:16, James Robertson wrote: > >>On May 14, 2000 at 13:22:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>I know that any top GM like Van Wely can pratice against the commercial Fritz 6a >>>program and eventually learn how to squeeze the positional disadvantages of any >>>top commercial programs, but this eventually take time and deep calculations. >>>After watching the latest game between Van Wely vs Fritz SSS, I am >>>more convinced that even with the clear advantage that Van Wely obtained, if >>>this would have been game in 30 minutes per side and the program is set not to >>>resign unless it is losing by minus 9 points, it is clear that Fritz SSS or any >>>other of the top three programs giving this position can hold until the time of >>>30 minutes has passed by the human player, therefore, losing a won game. the >>>reason behind this, is that just to reach this position it would take at least >>>20 minutes, and again that is if the program does not have this opening. >> >>Which is why Anand beat Fritz last year in a 4-game G/25 match? >> >>Be realistic. Van Wely had at least a +6 advantage in that final position. I'll >>wager he could win it even if he had only 5 minutes left on his clock. >> >>James > >Think about it, in game in 30 minutes per side Van Wely would have never reached >this position, in reality it took him a little bit over 2 hour. >Plus you can never compare Anand to Van Wely playing against computer. Anand is >the only player that I can think of who can still beat a computer using the >latest hardware in game less than 30 minutes per side.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.