Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 16:57:49 05/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2000 at 19:53:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 14, 2000 at 19:27:32, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On May 14, 2000 at 18:56:45, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On May 14, 2000 at 18:38:46, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>A player of that caliber doesn't take unnecessary risks without knowing the >>>>implications, especially playing a game shorter than 60 minutes per side. what I >>>>am referring to is opening his position wide open against one of the most >>>>tactical monster ever created. If Fritz SSS would not have lost so many tempos >>>>moving his bishop so many times and instead would have chosen to centralize his >>>>pieces, Fritz SSS would have collected more human bones and donated to his >>>>programmer Frans as a collectible trophy. >>> >>>This doesn't exactly prove that Fritz would have beaten van Wely with a shorter >>>timespan. van Wely might have chosen another plan, or maybe he knows that Fritz >>>have problems with piece coordination in a certain type of position. Loosing >>>tempos wouldn't be less frequent if the timecontrol is shorter IMO. I don't know >>>how often a GM discards an intuitional move after calculation, which is a >>>problem when there's less time. >>> >>>Sincerely, >>>Mogens >> >>And so what if it does? Set 'em up at game in one minute and Fritz probably >>wins. There's a crossover point, certainly. > >I never mentioned game in a minute per side you know better than that, even Gnu- >Chess can beat any GM in game in one minute per side. > >Jorge >> >>By the way, Seirawan and Shirov could not only win like this, they could win >>using more natural human vs human play. I'm sure many others could, as well. >> >>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.