Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:12:20 05/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2000 at 12:57:15, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 14, 2000 at 02:14:10, blass uri wrote: > >>On May 13, 2000 at 23:38:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On May 13, 2000 at 22:07:38, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On May 13, 2000 at 19:51:18, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>I remember 13 years ago when the top program Mchess was reaching Master level >>>>>close to 2200 Elo by USCF and I also remember a statement from Larry Kaufman >>>>>saying that it will take at least a good 15 years for a P.C. program to reach >>>>>GM level at the rate of Processors speed doubling every years, at that time the >>>>>top Processor was a mere 80286 operating at 12 Mhz at the most. I Thought at >>>>>that time that Kasparov if he was still Champion will defeat very easy a P.C. >>>>>in game in 30 minutes per side. But now that the time has arrived I realize that >>>>>any of the top three P.C. Programs with any processor higher than 800 >>>>>Mhz can beat Kasparov in game in 30 minutes per side. >>>>> >>>>>PS: Since piket just recently beat Kasparov in the Grand Prix not to long ago, >>>>>and Fritz SSS drew Piket at the Dutch Tournamwent, I can almost presume that in >>>>>game in 60 minutes per side, Fritz SSS or any other top three Programs can beat >>>>>Kasparov in a mini match of 7 games using the latest Processor. >>>> >>>>I beat Michael Oshiro, who beat Viktors Pupols, who beat Bobby Fischer. >>>>Therefore, I am a better chess player than Bobby Fischer. >>>> >>>>bruce >>> >>> >>>Good Point I did exagerated a little when I presume that in game in 60 minutes >>>per side any of the top three programs can beat Kasparov, but i still hold that >>>Kasparov no longer can beat any of the top three programs in a mini match of 7 >>>games in game 30 minutes per side. >> >>I am not sure about it. >>When kasparov played against Genius3 he believed that he is playing against >>Genius2. >> >>Kasparov won Genius3 1.5:.5 later when Genius3 used p120. >>I think that the time control was 25 minutes/game. >> >>I think that the fact that kasparov has the top programs and can learn their >>weaknesses and their games is a big advantage. >> >>Uri > >After watching the latest game between Van wely vs Fritz SSS I am more convinced >that even with the clear advantage that Van Wely had if this would have been >game in 30 Minutes per side and the program is set not to resign unless there is >an advantage of minus 9 points it is clear that fritz SSS or any other top >programs giving this same position can hold until the time of 30 minutes has >passed by the human player therefore losing the won game. The score is already -5 and dropping. A good GM could win this game with 5 minutes on his clock, in a sudden death time control, even if the program had a year to compute.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.