Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 00:12:18 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 03:09:06, Tony Werten wrote: >On May 16, 2000 at 03:05:27, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On May 16, 2000 at 00:19:32, Michel Langeveld wrote: >> >>>http://www.nkschaken.nl/schaken/verslag/protesttiviakov15mei.htm >>> >>>Translated from Dutch by me. >>> >>>Protest of Sergei Tiviakov 15 mei 2000 >>> >>>By: Sergei Tiviakov(source: Royal Dutch Chess Federation) >>> >>>Protest of Sergey Tiviakov against the handling of Frans Morsch in corporation >>>with Fritz SSS* (Frans Morsch) >>> >>>I did everything to win this game and also reached also a completely won >>>position (evaluation -+). The operator should not play further with a evaluation >>>of -2 (equal to two pawns) on time. >>> >>>In this situation the computer is not equal to a human player and has a huge >>>advantage. The operator has to give up at respect for the human player. >>> >>>What is the meaning of corporation of Fritz at this tournament? The ranklist or >>>receiving experience to enhance the program. What is the meaning of the >>>operator? The operator who showed much respect to Dimitry Reinderman by >>>accepting the draw in an very unclear position with a lot of pawns on g4 and h5. >>> >>>Also against Piket played the operator not further in an equal position. So the >>>operator showed a lot of respect to other GM's, and why not for me. >>> >>>In the rules and regulations stands that also with an equal finish in final >>>standings the computer is excepted for a tie break (30 minutes a game). This >>>rule is accepted because of the computer advantage the computer has against a >>>human. >>> >>>Also the draw offer when I had 2 minutes on the clock, was unusual, because of >>>that I lost my concentration and blundered directly and gave away the victory. >>> >>>If I wanted draw I could always claim it. I ask the commision of Beroep to >>>change the score to 0-1. >> >>It seems that operators have to resign if the opponent is short in time and the >>program score is below zero. >>Ain't that ridiculous ? > >Agreed. Next step he has to accept a draw when the player uses up almost all his >time for the first move and the offers a draw. > >"He showed no respect. The position was equal and I was in timetrouble" > >Tony Yes, that'd be highly "respectful".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.