Author: Francesco Di Tolla
Date: 03:06:21 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 05:07:29, Hans Gerber wrote: >>I agree that F. Morsch behaved impolitely but it does not change the fact that >>tiviakov complained also about the fact that the operator did not resign in a >>lost position and this complain is not justified. >> >>Uri > > >I forgot to comment on your article. Here I agree with you. _This_ claim is >nonsense. It is so nonsense that FIDE laws say that the player may ask to the operator to resign. This is because the computer cannot get offended. Of course the oeprator is not forced, since he might have a different opinion. >...F. Morsch had granted Reindermann a draw in unclear position And this is instead a right of the operator, which can accept a draw but not offer it, unless the program asks for it directly (As you say an inernal solution). regards Franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.