Author: Tony Werten
Date: 03:45:12 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 06:27:06, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >I have a new idea, I think that the problem between Fritz and Tiviakov is mainly >due to the incompatibility between sudden-death ending and computer >participation to tournaments. > >It is clear to anybody that computers are much stronger than most GM's at blitz, >and also that we are NOT interested in testing blitz-chess in a regular >tournament. > >The sudden-death ending of the games with one hour or 30' as third time control >was introduced to help humans and save them from the physical effort of having >to play long games or adjourned ones. > >It is clear to me that the sudden death is fine if you have two humans (or two >computers) facing each other, but it is also clear to me that it is not 100% >fair when it comes to human vs. computer. > >The solution I see is that the sudden-death ending of the games should be played >(at least between humans and computers) with a Fischer clock, and a little inc >for the last time control. 10 seconds are enough for a GM to win a simple won >position. (I think FIDE is already suggesting some solution like that as a >general replacement of the sudden-death > >In such a case the operator would not have had any reason to offer draw and most >probably Tiviakov would have had used his 2 minutes+ inc to win. > >regards >Franz I guess you're right. Another thing that should have been though of before the tournement. By the end of the tournement they will know exactly how to organise such an event, but nobody ever wants to see one again. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.