Author: Hans Gerber
Date: 16:27:04 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 19:03:11, Mark Young wrote: >Translated from Dutch by me. > >Protest of Sergei Tiviakov 15 mei 2000 > >By: Sergei Tiviakov(source: Royal Dutch Chess Federation) > >Protest of Sergey Tiviakov against the handling of Frans Morsch in corporation >with Fritz SSS* (Frans Morsch) > >I did everything to win this game and also reached also a completely won >position (evaluation -+). The operator should not play further with a evaluation >of -2 (equal to two pawns) on time. > >*In this situation the computer is not equal to a human player and has a huge >advantage. The operator has to give up at respect for the human player.* > >_______________________________ > > >I don't understand the logic of this protest. Can someone explain why just >because a chess program is stronger then humans in some aspects and situations >in chess, why this means the human should be awarded a win without winning the >game? Perhaps this helps. The logic is that the human would win against humans and the human can't lose such a position, then the machine should lose and not draw the game. We speak about classical tournament chess. Not rapid chess nor blitz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.