Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tieviekov protests and claims a win against Fritz

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 17:18:13 05/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2000 at 19:54:18, Hans Gerber wrote:

>On May 16, 2000 at 12:13:28, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>>The clock is part of the game, and therefore the position wasn't hopeless for
>>Fritz.  If Tiviakov had 30 minutes left instead of 2, I'm sure Morsch would have
>>resigned for Fritz.
>
>
>Of what game? I agree that in rapid and blitz this is clear. But in classical
>tournament chess this is different. No GM offers a draw in a lost position. I

In tournament chess, when you assess a position, you really must consider both
the board and the clock.  Down two pawns with 30 minutes left on the clock is
probably dead lost.  Down two pawns with 1 or 2 minutes left on the clock is
still a very interesting contest.


>>
>>>4. F. Morsch behaved impolitely and without respect. Because you don't propose
>>>draw in lost positions (as operator of a machine).
>>>
>>
>>This is so silly.  If Morsch hadn't made that very courteous draw offer there is
>>a good chance that Tiviakov would have lost that game on time, or even blundered
>>in time pressure and lost on the board.
>
>
>No, this is not silly. Tiviakov had a won game and if he had wanted to make a
>draw he could have without F. Morsch's proposal. So, Tiviakov could never lose
>the game.
>

This isn't so clear to me, though I will admit I am not totally familiar with
how FIDE handles these situations.  See my recent post in the "Still Missing the
Point" thread.


>>Oh, and I've played tournament chess for 15 years, so spare me any lectures on
>>the "codex of behavior".  Draw offers from a player who is worse on the board
>>but way up on the clock are completely normal and acceptable.
>
>
>I believe you. Still in our case you are wrong. The position wasn't worse, it
>was lost.

It's true that you have to walk a fine line with these draw offers.  The offer
should be genuine, meaning that you should really think you have a sufficient
time advantage to compensate for the position on the board.

Time increments are the simple solution to this mess, of course.  :-)

--Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.