Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About difficulties to substantiate one's claims (R. Hyatt vs Kasparov)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:03:53 05/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 17, 2000 at 07:14:30, Hans Gerber wrote:

>On May 17, 2000 at 00:09:44, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>So the DB team accused themselves of cheating, in public?  How do you figure
>>that?  Kasparov made the claim.  In public.  Exactly as I said.  Exactly as
>>documented by hundreds of newspapers around the world.
>
>
>I would prefer to leave such minor important "bickering" out of a serious
>debate.
>
>Let me repeat what I wanted to say. The DB team was the side that went into the
>public with the telling that they had been outrageously insulted by Kasparov's
>accusation of possible cheating. That is the meaning of the B. Weber article in
>the NY Times.



You keep trolling this same argument.  It is bogus.  The initial claim of
cheating was made public _prior_ to the NY Times article you are quoting.  It
is quite obvious.  Otherwise how would Murray "Shrug off the accusation"???  He
would first make it public then shrug it off?

Nonsense.




>
>However - that is now my point - Kasparov did _not_ go with his theory into the
>public before that. You are the only one who hypostated such a thing. You
>hypostated Kasparov's participation on a press conference after game two where
>he should have said the like. My point is, there was not such a public statement
>by Kasparov after game two.


based on what?  what you _want_ to be the truth???

Again, were you there?  The people I talked to _were_.


>
>Up to now you didn't substantiate your claim of the existence of such a public
>accusation. It was the DB itself who ran into the public with that.


Nope.  that is just a lame claim you are making.


>
>Now, after you couldn't substantiate you declare the whole question as moot
>whether the DB team was the side which went into the public _first_.


You have _zero_ data, yet you can conclude lots of things from it, right?  And
I have to disprove your imagination?  I don't have time for that.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.