Author: Jürgen Hartmann
Date: 07:31:48 05/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
> >1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nf3 e6 5. Be2 c5 6. Be3 cxd4 7. Nxd4 Ne7 8. c4 >Nbc6 9. Nc3 Nxd4 10. Bxd4 dxc4 11. Qa4 Nc6 12. Rd1 Bd3 13. Bxd3 cxd3 14. Rxd3 >Bc5 15. Ne4 Bxd4 16. Nd6 Kf8 17. Rxd4 Nxd4 18. Qxd4 Qa5 19. Ke2 Kg8 20. h4 h5 >21. Rh3 Qxa2 22. Rf3 Qa6 23. Ke1 Rd8 24. Ra3 Qc6 25. Qf4 f6 26. Rxa7 Rh6 27. >Rxb7 Rg6 28. Qe4 Rxd6 * (0:11/1:14) > > >Fritz says -4.19. Game over. > >Enrique Maybe this game illustrates well what humans might dislike about playing computers: Out of a possible blunder in the opening, De Vreugt was able to create a position with "practical" chances. I very much liked his exchange sac. Playing for chance is an art and has always been praised highly (Tal). But practical chances demand tactical oversights of the opponent. Jürgen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.