Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Programmers and GMs on the same level??

Author: Hans Gerber

Date: 14:02:44 05/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2000 at 23:30:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:

(snip)

>I don't have any great respect for a GM above anyone else.  Frans has a _lot_
>of blood, sweat and tears invested in the software program named "Fritz".  Don't
>_ever_ forget that.  I can't say whether he has sweated more than the typical
>GM.  But I am pretty sure he hasn't sweated _less_.  So Frans deserves the GM's
>respect just as much as the GM deserves Frans'.  quid pro quo.  The draw was a
>mutually respectable outcome.

Excuse me, this goes too far. You can't compare a GM, a genial chessplayer, with
a programmer. A chessplayer is in the spheres of sports, art and science. He's
living there. Ok? Whereas the programmer might be a real good scientist but he
can't compete in sports and art. The program perhaps could create good chess.
But that is a difficult question. Don't fantasize that programmers live sports
like a GM just because he's watching and/or operating the machine's performance.
Of course a programmer also has deep emotions in such cases. But he's _not_
playing himself! Still I would agree that the secondary feeling of joy and pride
and nervous tension could be very satisfying. But it's still a difference if you
sit there yourself and do play your own game.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.