Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About difficulties to substantiate one's claims (R. Hyatt vs Kasparo

Author: Hans Gerber

Date: 14:48:51 05/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 17, 2000 at 17:35:52, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>Hi Hans,
>	there was a press conference after game three. A brief summary of the parts
>relevant to game two is at the end of the following page:
>http://www.insidechess.com/events/kasparov2.html
>José.


Thanks very much Jose. Yes, after the third game there was a press conference,
where Kasparov talked about the suspicions. My debate with R. Hyatt however was
about something different. He claimed that it was Kasparov who had opened the
public war. But I could show that the DB team, in special M. Campbell, started
the psychowar when they engaged the NY Times and made a few negative statements
about Kasparov. This was it how all that began. Kasparov asked in private for
the prints. They answered positively. Then suddenly they said "no". At that
moment they went into the public. Thus they insulted Kasparov. Kasparov also
didn't hesitate to talk.

R. Hyatt however changed the whole history. As if Kasparov had insulted the DB
team just by asking for the prints (in private! but R. Hyatt hypostated that he
had asked in public).

R. Hyatt always hypostated a press conference after game two. But he didn't
substantiate his claim.

Instead he called the whole question "moot". All very telling behavior...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.