Author: Pete Galati
Date: 19:32:30 05/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 17, 2000 at 20:13:48, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi: >Maybe this happens: once they have lost 10064 games, at last even the most >patzerish patzer learn how to get some results from some programs. I do not know >how to rate this kind of results. It is also probable that playing 34566748 >games against GM and losing all of them, a day comes you can win the guy. Of >course netx 6655443 games are a lose again, because the GM change his mood. >Problem is precisely that: machines does not change enough. Still learning >capabilities are of low level kind, uncapable for avoiding enterily lost tracks >Fernando It could be that one of the ways to make life more difficult for GMs playing Chess programs would be to randomly change some of the evaluation parameters with each move. This would probably only weaken the program though. But it would tend to lend an unpredictable nature to the program. But probably GMs could handle it ok, & they'd probably just play very closed games like the average anticomputer player does, and that random change to the eveluations would fall apart anyhow. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.