Author: Mike S.
Date: 12:03:14 05/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2000 at 14:27:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >(...) >Personally, I think that failing to rise to the challenge of playing computers >shows that man's time for dominance in the game has passed. Humans may >actually *be* better right now. But already, the spirit has been broken. >Hence, humans have already lost. I don't think so. This fight has just begun. In a wider public, some might think that the 2nd match Kasparov-Deep Blue has drawn the final curtain over human superiority in chess. But (as it has surely been said often already) if you look at this match in detail, it shows Kasparov as the better player: He won the first game, resigned the 2nd in a drawn position, drew game 3-5 and threw away the last one in the opening, which doesn't matter much. The only "real" victory was by Kasparov. Regards, M.Scheidl Permanent Brain: http://members.surfeu.at/MScheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.