Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About difficulties to substantiate one's claims (R. Hyatt vs Kasparov)

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 06:10:54 05/19/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 18, 2000 at 07:20:01, Hans Gerber wrote:

>I think the details are very important. For about a week I discussed with R.
>Hyatt about a "press conference after game two". He could never substantiate his
>statement. Recently R. Hyatt wrote that this has been wrong but that it wasn'zt
>"important". Now he hypostated that Kasparov was the first to go into the public
>with his accusations of cheating after game three. For me it is still unknown
>what had happened in private after game two. If he had asked for the prints and
>then was treated the way we know by now, Kasparov was not the one who started
>the psychowar. He did not talk about cheating in public although some (also M.
>Ashly) tried to bring him into such a wording.

Well, he really did suggest cheating.  And he continues to suggest it.
See
http://www.clubkasparov.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=4954&p_docLang=EN
(all on one line).

I think I remember reading the same accusations by Kasparov in the match
commentary files on IBM's website, but for some reason the last half of the file
(fileS - all 6 of them!) is gibberish.  Included in the missing part is the
post-game stuff. :(



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.