Author: blass uri
Date: 07:27:04 05/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2000 at 09:42:07, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On May 19, 2000 at 09:37:19, Chris Carson wrote: > >>I am planning to publish an updated list list here with >>all rated human vs computer results for 40/2 events. >> >>Please let me know your thoughts on the following: >> >>1. Exclude Performance Rating when 3 or fewer games >> have been played by a program/hardware. > >I don't see why. > >>2. Exclude forfiets and protest resignations (Dutch Championship), >> and games where computers lost due to hardware, IP failures, >> or operator error. > >I would definitely exclude forfeits and IP failures, but not the rest. In my >opinion, this list is interesting if it reflects the real performance of >programs in actual games. Hardware failures and operator's errors are part of >how a program plays. Forfeits and IP failures are not. > >Enrique Do you really think that losing on time is part of how shredder4 plays? I do not agree. I think that operator's error are not part of how a program plays and it is not fair to include the game that shredder lost on time in a winning position when the reason was not a bug in the program. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.