Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 15:15:39 05/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2000 at 14:21:26, Wybe Koopmans wrote: >On May 19, 2000 at 10:46:36, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On May 19, 2000 at 10:37:52, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On May 19, 2000 at 09:29:52, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>Van der Wiel could give lessons on anti-computer strategy. Of course he is a >>>VERY old hand at it, and probably the most experienced of all the players in the >>>tournament. Made it look simple. >>> >>> Albert Silver >> >>True, and also true for Grooten and van Wely. Back to the old question: how >>strong are today's programs? It depends on how the opponent plays against them: >>in the van der Wiel, van Wely and Grooten way, or in the (foolish) style of van >>den Doel and de Vreugt. >> >>Overall, Fritz scored very well, with 5 points out of 9 and almost a GM norm. By >>the way, I think that Fritz running on a P300 would have lost and won the same >>games. >> >>Enrique > >Come on Enrique, Fritz didn't scored well. 5 out of nine, 55.6% without forfeits. > It's a long way to be a GM in Holland >:-) 8 Elo points is not a long way. Fritz almost, almost got a GM norm. >First Piket, agree well done >3 times a walk-over (v.d. Sterren, Bosboom and v.d. Doel) And de Vreugt. >Grooten and Tiviakov, winning positions for humans But Grooten lost and Tiviakov drew. You must count that too. I know that Grooten and Tiviakov did. >v. Wely and v.d Wiel high standard anti-computer play >de Vreugt, young and now a GM ! > >2,5 out 9 You have a funny way to count, Wybe. It was 5 out of 9. Enrique >Wybe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.