Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 18:29:53 05/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2000 at 09:12:47, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On May 19, 2000 at 08:54:58, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On May 19, 2000 at 08:27:33, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>I don't especially like that idea, for many reasons. One of which is that it >>>would not be as equal as possible. If, for example, Fritz-Nimzo is the Nunn >>>position #1 and Fritz-Hiarcs is Position #5, there are then two variables in the >>>experiment, rather than just one. >>> >>>It might be nice to try something similar to what you suggest sometime, but I >>>don't think the resources are available to do it at very long time controls. >>> >>>Jeremiah >> >>I agree, I don't think that Nunn is better in any way. Have you decided to use >>the same book for all? > >I don't really know how or if that can be accomplished... Each program will >probably just use its regular book. We could look at the old rules and try to follow them as closely as possible.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.