Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 00:21:45 05/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2000 at 22:58:27, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >The biggest humor in Dave's prior posting (an irony really) is that he seems to >*jump* from current discussions regarding measuring how well a program has done >(our perennial question--are top programs GMs *now* or not!) in the past, to >thinking about predicting better (smaller SEE, Standard Error of Estimate or >Standard Error of Forecast) how a program will do (in the future). It might have seemed like a jump, but the discussion regarding measuring whether top programs are GM strength *now* or not isn't interesting to me, so it's IMO reasonable that if I have a comment to make in the thread that some topic shift will be involved. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.