Author: Mike S.
Date: 07:17:23 05/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2000 at 18:22:34, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >(...) > >Having said that I would hope that GM's and Comps can get togethar and compete >in serious Tournaments with the best of the best of the two groups wherein the >GM's will feel comfortable and play there very best, win or loose and thus we >would have a third crowned champion. > >Any of this make sense ? I think yes, a reasonable compromise idea. It would be good if there would compete two groups as you say (not only one player each), i.e. with the top eight players from each group. I'm afraid that such an event would more or less be an invitation tournament, because obviously it's not possible to reach a common consent about the traditional World Chess Championship nowadays (for the human side, the top 8 players of the elo rating list could be qualified). But if this can be managed, we could have the following titles: a) human champion (from the competition among human players) b) computer champion (from the competition among computer chess systems) c) champion of the planet (winner of the human-comp event) But I would prefer to have computers integrated at all levels, having them included in the various qualifying processes. This seems more natural to me. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.