Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Khalifman and Gelfand on computer

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 15:26:36 05/20/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 2000 at 17:51:34, Christophe Theron wrote:

>No, what you are suggesting is practically impossible. It's like asking a human
>player to forget everything about the opening theory. You cannot be sure he will
>obey, and there is no way to check.

If you say so, I'll believe it even though I'm not entirely convinced. It's not
important since I don't advocate removing the opening book, but just asking a
question about possible lack of interest in promoting new ideas and replacing
them with shortcuts and computer power.

>I have already suggested some time ago that the power of computers playing in
>human tournaments should simply be limited.
>
>Restrictions on the number of processor(s), speed of processor, and total memory
>size (including hard disk). And even restriction on the power consumption.
>
>This could maybe make the GMs less angry about computers, and boost the
>programmer's creativity.
>
>If we do not do that, then
>1) Programmers will simply work to stuff more processors into a PC box and make
>them work together (and find a way to cool down the thing).
>2) Computers will be banned from human tournaments.
>
>I don't really care about the restrictions, I'll follow them as soon as they are
>applied to any computer opponent.

I think we agree on almost all points. I'm pleased that programmers aren't as
hardheaded as Uri suggests :o).

Best wishes...
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.