Author: Alvaro Rodriguez
Date: 02:02:07 05/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2000 at 17:25:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 20, 2000 at 16:08:00, Alvaro Rodriguez wrote: > >>You mean like a learning function? Learning from games they have played >>themselves without opening book? I think that some programs plays pretty strange >>moves and completly dislike some known theory without an opening book.. >>I´m not really sure, but I´ve heard this many times.. >>Maybe someone would like to do some testing, playing different programs against >>each other without opening book, and then compare them to the games with opening >>book. > >Yes, that was the idea. To make the program "discover" by experience what moves >are correct and what are not. It might even extend known opening theory. > >>> Gelfand believes that exterior means >>>improve the chess programs, which I think is correct. >> >>Improve what? > >Opening and endgame play to mention a couple of examples. > >Sincerely, >Mogens Yes, it is a good idea. Then, the GM´s can´t complain about opening books or tablebases.. The programmers need to agree of course :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.