Author: blass uri
Date: 15:49:00 05/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2000 at 17:02:02, Marcos Christensen wrote: >On May 20, 2000 at 07:11:31, Terje Vagle wrote: > >>1r6/5kp1/RqQb1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp1B3/2P4P/6P1/5K2 b - - >> >>After 45. Ra6, Fritz suggests Qe3 for black and evaluates the position as 0,94. >>It does not seem to find the famous draw-line for Kasparov. >>10 hours analysis on PIII-600, and 28006383 KN evaluated >> >>Does any other program find the draw-line? >> >> >>Regards >> >> >>Terje > I thought that even deeper blue didnt saw the draw! Maybe I'm wrong Deeper blue did not see the draw but it does not change the fact that people expect other programs to be better than deeper blue. I believe that the estimate that program will need 10 years to get to the level of deeper blue is wrong because deeper blue did serious search errors like not seeing the draw and the fact that other programs do the same search error is going to change in the future. We will never know when programs are at the same level of deeper blue because deeper blue had the advantage of being unknown when it played against kasparov when other programs will not have the same advantage(kasparov will not agree to play them in the same conditions. The first program+hardware to win kasparov must be clearly better than deeper blue. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.