Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep-Blue vs Kasparov, 2.game,

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 16:02:26 05/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 21, 2000 at 18:49:00, blass uri wrote:

>On May 21, 2000 at 17:02:02, Marcos Christensen wrote:
>
>>On May 20, 2000 at 07:11:31, Terje Vagle wrote:
>>
>>>1r6/5kp1/RqQb1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp1B3/2P4P/6P1/5K2 b - -
>>>
>>>After 45. Ra6, Fritz suggests Qe3 for black and evaluates the position as 0,94.
>>>It does not seem to find the famous draw-line for Kasparov.
>>>10 hours analysis on PIII-600, and 28006383 KN evaluated
>>>
>>>Does any other program find the draw-line?
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>Terje
>>    I thought that even deeper blue didnt saw the draw! Maybe I'm wrong
>
>Deeper blue did not see the draw but it does not change the fact that people
>expect other programs to be better than deeper blue.
>
>I believe that the estimate that program will need 10 years to get to the level
>of deeper blue is wrong because deeper blue did serious search errors like not
>seeing the draw and the fact that other programs do the same search error is
>going to change in the future.
>

This will _never_ change.  Programs will _always_ have "search errors".  I don't
think a program will find that draw in the next 10 years.  The reason is pretty
obvious... to find the quiet queen move deep in the tree means the tree is going
to be _huge_ since many other "quiet" (but very useless) moves will be searched.

Hang on to the position for a while.  Let's see when it is really solved (IE
the program won't play the Rook move because it sees the forced draw.)


>We will never know when programs are at the same level of deeper blue because
>deeper blue had the advantage of being unknown when it played against kasparov
>when other programs will not have the same advantage(kasparov will not agree to
>play them in the same conditions.
>

We will have a fair idea.. when a program can play reasonably level with
Kasparov.



>The first program+hardware to win kasparov must be clearly better than deeper
>blue.
>

How/why??




>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.