Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I fully agree!

Author: James Robertson

Date: 13:05:14 05/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 22, 2000 at 11:50:35, ShaktiFire wrote:

>On May 22, 2000 at 06:18:47, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 2000 at 06:11:59, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>On May 22, 2000 at 04:31:58, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 22, 2000 at 03:34:28, blass uri wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 22, 2000 at 01:38:12, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 22, 2000 at 01:27:53, blass uri wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They do not indicate it because you do not know what is the rating improvement
>>>>>>>from 4 processors relative to single 450Mhz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>But I know, it's at least 100 points as comp-comp games have indicated!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jouni
>>>>>
>>>>>You cannot know because the difference in comp-comp games does not have to be
>>>>>the same as comp-human games and I am also not sure that the difference in
>>>>>comp-comp games is 100 points because the ssdf did not test the new hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>>We can know the difference between p200 and K6-450 but we cannot know the
>>>>>difference between k6-450 and better hardware because it is possible that there
>>>>>is diminishing returns from hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hasn't Heinz new book conclusion: there is no proof about  diminishing returns
>>>>so far...
>>>>
>>>>Jouni
>>>
>>>There is no proof so we do not know if there is diminishing return or there is
>>>not.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>The only way to prove that there is not diminishing return is by games and there
>>are not many comp-comp games at tournament time control to compare.
>>
>>We know that there is no significant diminishing return when you upgrade from
>>p200 to K6-450 but we do not know what happens when we upgrade from K6-450 to
>>better hardware.
>>
>>Uri
>
>The evidence is there in the ratings.  At one time, SSDF correlated with
>human-computer games.  Now the SSDF rating is much higher than actual human-
>computer
>results.  This indicates..... against humans, there is a diminishing return with
>increase in computer speed.

Not necessarily; it is quite possible that the returns are not diminishing, but
just that they are smaller at all speed increases.

James

 In computer - computer ratings, the ratings are
>still increasing linearly with ply.  Its hard to plot this out, with different
>software versions, but the trend from p90 to p 200 to k6-450 is there...
>basically linear ratings increase with ply increase.   This might change later,
>since I believe the actual curve, ratings vs ply in computer vs. computer, is
>piecewise linear, and gradually decreasing, but not decreasing as quickly as
>in comp vs human play.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.