Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 17:52:24 05/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2000 at 18:25:15, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On May 21, 2000 at 21:09:29, Michael Neish wrote: > >> >>Hi, >> >>No they're not playing again (for the moment), although we probably all wish >>they would. >> >>I'd just like to ask something about the game. We all know how decisively Van >>Wely took Fritz apart in the recent Dutch Championships. There was a lot of >>talk about computers failing miserably at this sort of position. >> >>I may have missed something, but I can't remember reading anything about how >>Fritz should have defended the position, i.e., what a strong player would have >>done. >> >>If programmers are to eliminate this yawning hole in their evaluations, they >>need to know what to patch up or rewrite. Unfortunately for us weak players >>it's not only a programming problem but lack of understanding of the game that >>lets us down. >> >>So if there are any half-way decent players out there who are interested in the >>game, could you please let us know what a GM (or strong player) would have done >>in Fritz's place? (I think we need something more detailed than "stop White's >>Pawn storm".) >> >>Game follows below ...... >> >>Cheers, >> >>Mike. >> >>---------- >> >>[Event "Dutch championship"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "2000.??.??"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Van Wely"] >>[Black "Fritz SSS"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[ECO "A25"] >>[WhiteElo "2646"] >>[PlyCount "49"] >> >>1. c4 e5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 Nc6 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. a3 Bxc3 6. bxc3 O-O 7. e4 a6 8. a4 >>d6 9. d3 Bg4 10. f3 Bd7 11. Ne2 Qc8 12. h3 b6 13. f4 Be6 14. f5 Bd7 15. g4 Ne8 >>16. Ng3 Qd8 17. g5 Bc8 18. h4 f6 19. Qh5 Na5 20. Ra3 Qe7 21. Nf1 Nc6 22. Ne3 >>Qd7 23. g6 h6 24. Ng4 Ra7 25. Rg1 1-0 > >I Believe the opening it chose was not good for a comp to play (I don't feel a >human would even be comfortable with it :) I think that 3..c6 even 3..d5 would >have been better suited for a program than the nc6, I don't like this move, it >seems like a waste of time because it has to move again to allow a challenge >against d5 with ..c6 ..d5 or some creative way. ..Bg4? :)) basically its pawn >structure didn't get setup correctly against whites, no breaks where created >(..b5 ..d5 ..f5) a big mess :) my opinion > thanks oops I didn't mean wrong opening I meant wrong opening line :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.