Author: ujecrh
Date: 11:53:44 05/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2000 at 19:25:23, Mogens Larsen wrote: >If mankind were guided by necessity alone, we wouldn't have gotten very far IMO. >A bicycle isn't an excuse not to invent a car. But I agree that it's highly >unlikely that this kind of knowledge will be added. I can live with that. Just >don't tell me it's the optimal solution from a theoretical standpoint, because I >disagree. Of course I won't and we can probably still find some games where the human player gets the advantage because he finds a way out of the book where the computer can not handle this because of a lack of opening knowledge. But, even if that was usual some years ago (remember Kasparov player e3 the first time against Fritz) is becomes more and more difficult to find because books are improving too. I would like to see more opening knowledge in programs too. ujecrh
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.