Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 23:25:40 05/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2000 at 00:17:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >The problem is that the only "old" evidence was self-play with varied depth. >Which is probably not a good test, since small changes are often magnified in >self-test play, while at other times small changes have no effect at all. > This part confuses me. Why would self-play be inferior to a test suite? I don't understand what you mean by "small-changes" above... I always thought the "go deep" experiments were testsuite-based because of the enormous time reuiqred to play a meaningful number of games with 15-16 ply searches. Not true? --Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.