Author: blass uri
Date: 15:19:31 05/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2000 at 18:16:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 24, 2000 at 17:46:55, blass uri wrote: >>On May 24, 2000 at 17:27:19, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>I have a bit of a puzzle. >>> >>>In these experiments, you varied the depth from 5 to 12 plies, but in the "goes >>>deep" experiments, it was deeper, if I recall correctly. >> >>It was deeper but it was not based on comp-comp games and I think that the >>positions do not demonstrate what happens in comp-comp games(I read that the >>positions were taken from kasparov-deep blue games and if this is the case >>kasparov chose positions that computers do not understand so the fact that they >>changed their mind even at big depthes is not surprising(you change your mind >>when you have no idea what to do). >> >>> >>>In the earlier experiments, it seemed to level out. >>> >>>I would like to see control matches where the plies are equal. >>>IOW, 5:5, 6:6 up to 12:12. >>>In that way, you will know what the gain of the extra ply is. I don't think you >>>can tell clearly strictly from the data given. >>> >>>For example, in your 12 <==> 11 experiment, you show 35.71% wins, 52.38% draws, >>>and 11.9% losses. What would the result be for 12:12? >> >>I guess that the result will be 50% because Fritz6 played against itself. > >I will be shocked if it turns out that way. For instance, no computer chess >program has a perfectly symmetrical eval. I do not believe that this generaliztion is correct but it does not change the fact that the expected result of program against itself is 50% Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.