Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:37:54 05/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2000 at 09:48:19, Frank Wolf wrote:
>I've been playing around with Hiarcs 7.32, Fritz 6 and Junior 6 to see which
>program gives the best analysis. I use Blundercheck on long time controls
>overnight. Hiarcs 7.32 and Fritz 6 are close, the lines and evaluations may
>differ a little but they basicly say the same thing. Junior 6 however will
>sometimes miss major mistakes. Lines rated minus 10 or worse by 7.32 and Fritz
>will be rated zero on Junior. The bottem line is I cannot trust the analysis of
>Junior 6 (with upgrade).
Since Junior is probably stronger, I would have thought the bottom line was the
other way around. If it beats those programs, then it's eval is superior,
particularly since it is known that it isn't winning due to better tactics.
Besides, minus 10? That's a tenth of a pawn according to Fritz or Hiarcs. Not
much.
Albert Silver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.