Author: James T. Walker
Date: 05:47:38 05/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2000 at 15:27:51, Albert Silver wrote: >On May 27, 2000 at 14:13:31, blass uri wrote: > >>On May 27, 2000 at 13:31:47, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On May 26, 2000 at 22:02:57, William Bryant wrote: >>> >>>>On May 26, 2000 at 13:10:33, Albert Silver wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/breaking/merc/docs/061931.htm >>>>> >>>>> Albert Silver >>>> >>>>In reading the hype of this article, it is quite clear just how much IBM won >>>>when Deep Blue beat Kasparov. >>>> >>>>William >>>>wbryant@ix.netcom.com >>> >>>No kidding. For the next ten years the speed of every computer they release >>>will be express in integer multiples of Deep Blue. >>> >>>And the wire services will continue to pick up their produce announcements, >>>because they perceive that the public is interested in Deep Blue. They would >>>not be interested in the dry technical details that would comprise these >>>announcements if Deep Blue hadn't existed. >>> >>>bruce >> >>The question is not what the public is interested in but what very rich people >>are interested. >> > >Not quite. The people who hold the money are rarely those who will be using the >machine, so that when convincing them to loosen the strings to their purse (now >there's an antiquated metaphor!), analogies they can appreciate, such as factors >of DB (this computer is 550 times the speed of Deep Blue), are important and do >weigh in. Professors and researchers are very rarely the ones who sign the >checks after all. > > Albert Silver Hello Albert, You are already exagerating it's speed. By next month this thing will be faster than the speed of light. :) Here is the quote from the article: "Before the win by Deep Blue -- the Finnish computer will be 150 times faster than the chess-playing machine -- IBM was No. 3 in a ranking of 500 supercomputer installations worldwide." Jim Walker > > >>I believe that the buyers of their super computer will not buy it because of the >>deep blue information but because they find that the super computer can help >>them in other subjects and the knowledge that deeper blue won kasparov in chess >>gives no information if the machine can help them for their needs. >> >>The number of calculation per second is clearly more relevant. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.