Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 06:20:47 05/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2000 at 23:35:09, blass uri wrote: >On May 27, 2000 at 23:22:20, blass uri wrote: ><snipped> >>I believe that computer programs are at IM level inspite of the fact that the >>IM's have the right to use programs to help them and that my level is better >>than the average IM level at correspondence games. > >I can add that I believe that most chess players can be better than the average >IM in correspondence games when both sides can use programs if they know to give >programs many hours to calculate and are careful not to trust programs only in a >small number of cases when they are sure that the program is wrong. > >Uri I agree, a chess player with FIDE rating around 2000 ELO, that knows as using in an appropriate way the team Human+Computer, can be at the level of a IM ICCF. I think that the best for the team human+computer is: 1. To give a long time so that only the program analyzes the position. 2. To analyze for a long time, with the help of the program, the chosen program move, and other moves that are interesting in the player's opinion. 3. Not to participate simultaneously of many tournaments. Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.