Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 08:21:57 05/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
Jeroen, You are the expert here. But I once played a correspondence game (with computer assistance allowed) and with extremely long analysis black did not manage to "refute" the knight sac, playing this line. The game ended in a draw (white had to fight for the draw, in the end). BTW: In my experience computers are not good in exploiting this sort of attack chances. The King is maybe the exception. I suggest you don't forget to use it here for analysis. Comparing King/Genius/Fritz/MChess (all I had then) The King was the only one suggesting promising continuations. Unfortunately I don't have it anymore. It looks like a good line for black, but after Bb3 0-0 I don't think black has necessarily much advantage. It has given another pawn to neutralize part of the problems. Which is probably not a bad idea. Regards, Bas. On May 28, 2000 at 09:56:34, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On May 27, 2000 at 21:40:01, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >Hello Bas, > >I have done a bit of analysis on this line and I wonder what White >will play after 4. Nxe5 Nxe5 5. d4 Ng6 6. e5 Ng8 7. Bc4 d5!? > >It seems that after 8. Bxd5 c6 9. Bb3 Be6! Black can remove the >dangerous white-squared bishop. Anything known about this line? > >Regards, Jeroen > > >>I play it at Blitz when I get the chance. It works mostly great but white has a >>problem after >> >> e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6 e5 Ng8 Bc4 Bb5 >> >>With the pinned knight, most of the venom is gone. This is the *only* answer I >>fear, when playing white... >> >> >>Bas Hamstra.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.