Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Halloween attack revisited

Author: James Robertson

Date: 16:03:58 05/29/00

On May 29, 2000 at 18:31:28, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On May 29, 2000 at 16:56:41, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>No, there were at least two separate threads with the same misspelling in the
>>header.
>
>Two, three or four times doesn't really matter. You don't start a thread about
>spelling, no matter how annoyed you might feel. A reply to the threads, changing
>the spelling, would have done the trick I believe.

Wait, wait; I never expressed any opinion about the matter! I just pointed out
two or three facts. I never said I agreed with the original post about
spelling....

James

>
>>Yes, I'll email my move to you.
>
>Got it. I'll reply as soon as I can, probably tomorrow since it's midnight here.
>
>Best wishes...
>Mogens

Okay, no problem then. (NT) Mogens Larsen 00:17:53 05/30/00
- Re: Okay, no problem then. (NT) James Robertson 12:16:44 05/30/00
  - Re: Okay, no problem then. (NT) Mogens Larsen 12:51:45 05/30/00
- It's a pity that nobody showed the correctness of the attack (NT) Olaf Jenkner 10:08:14 05/30/00
  - Re: It's a pity that nobody showed the correctness of the attack (NT) Dann Corbit 10:49:25 05/30/00
    - They did show the INcorrectness of the attack Albert Silver 12:31:16 05/30/00
      - Re: They did show the INcorrectness of the attack Robert Hyatt 14:53:45 05/30/00
        
        Re: They did show the INcorrectness of the attack Albert Silver 23:52:29 05/30/00
    - Re: It's a pity that nobody showed the correctness of the attack (NT) blass uri 11:22:55 05/30/00
      - Re: It's a pity that nobody showed the correctness of the attack (NT) Dann Corbit 12:29:44 05/30/00
        
        Re: It's a pity that nobody showed the correctness of the attack (NT) blass uri 14:24:12 05/30/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.