Author: stuart taylor
Date: 13:34:58 05/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2000 at 14:44:29, blass uri wrote: >On May 30, 2000 at 12:51:22, Joshua Lee wrote: > >> Cray Blitz 1981? >> Belle 1983? >> Hitech? >> Chiptest or Deep Thought? > >I guess that Hiarcs7.32 is going to win against programs of 1981 or 1983 or >Hitech. > >I will not guess about Deep thought but I believe that most people believe that >Hiarcs will win against Deep thought. > >Most chess players in israel "know" that Fritz3 won deep blue(they read it in >the newspaper or the journal that they get) and they believe that the only >difference between the program that lost against Fritz3 and the program that >played against kasparov was hardware. > >They also read that the explanation for the fact that Deep blue lost against >Fritz3 is probably better algoritems of the PC programs. > > >I read here that deep thought was unlucky against Fritz3 and got more than 90% >in games against it but almost nobody heard about it and the games are not >public. > >Science is about doing everything public. >Hsu did not do the data public so he can blame only himself for the fact that >many people do not respect Deep thought. > >Uri It's already a very well known conclusion made by me and others, that no non-human chess playing entity before 1990 would be able to avoid defeat in a match against hiarcs 7.01 or 7.32 running at 450mhz. I don't know why not, but that seems to be clear fact, against any hardware of then. Even much later than 1990 probably. No one can even prove that deep blue of 1996 was really better. Fritz 3 was a little baby on about 200mhz compared to hiarcs now on 450mhz., even if you say that it's only public game in which it beat deep blue was only a fluke. S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.